03/22/2023 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB90 | |
| SB49 | |
| Discussion: Ceraweek 2023 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 90 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 49 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE
March 22, 2023
3:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Click Bishop, Co-Chair
Senator Cathy Giessel, Co-Chair
Senator Bill Wielechowski, Vice Chair
Senator Scott Kawasaki
Senator James Kaufman
Senator Forrest Dunbar
Senator Matt Claman
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
SENATE BILL NO. 90
"An Act extending the termination date of the Alaska Minerals
Commission."
- HEARD & HELD
SENATE BILL NO. 49
"An Act relating to the geologic storage of carbon dioxide; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PRESENTATION(S): 2023 CERAWEEK Update
- HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SB 90
SHORT TITLE: EXTEND ALASKA MINERALS COMMISSION
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) BISHOP
03/06/23 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/06/23 (S) RES, FIN
03/22/23 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: SB 49
SHORT TITLE: CARBON STORAGE
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR
01/27/23 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/27/23 (S) RES, FIN
03/10/23 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/10/23 (S) Heard & Held
03/10/23 (S) MINUTE(RES)
03/13/23 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/13/23 (S) Heard & Held
03/13/23 (S) MINUTE(RES)
03/22/23 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
WITNESS REGISTER
ENRIQUE FERNANDEZ, Chair
Alaska Minerals Commission
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided invited testimony in support of SB
90.
KEVIN CONNORS, Assistant Director
Regulatory Compliance and Energy Policy
Energy and Environmental Resource Center
University of North Dakota
Grand Forks, North Dakota
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided invited testimony on SB 49.
JOHN BOYLE, Commissioner-Designee
Department of Natural Resources
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Discussed 2023 CERAWeek.
ADAM CRUM, Commissioner-Designee
Department of Revenue
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Discussed 2023 CERAWeek.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:30:21 PM
CO-CHAIR CATHY GIESSEL called the Senate Resources Standing
Committee meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Dunbar, Kaufman, Claman, Kawasaki,
Wielechowski, Co-Chair Bishop, and Co-Chair Giessel.
SB 90-EXTEND ALASKA MINERALS COMMISSION
3:30:56 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO.
90 "An Act extending the termination date of the Alaska Minerals
Commission."
3:31:11 PM
SENATOR CLICK BISHOP, District R, sponsor of SB 90, introduced
the legislation and paraphrased the sponsor statement.
Senate Bill 90 extends the Alaska Minerals Commission
(Minerals Commission) until June 30, 2034. The
Minerals Commission is currently set to sunset on
February 1, 2024.
Created in 1986, the 11-member Alaska Minerals
Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the
Governor and the Alaska State Legislature on ways to
mitigate constraints on the development of minerals in
Alaska. Five members are appointed by the Governor
(one of whom must reside in a rural community), three
members are appointed by the President of the Senate,
and three members are appointed by the Speaker of the
House of Representatives. Current commissioners
represent the placer, hard rock, and coal mining
industries across the state, along with a
representative from an Alaska Native Corporation. The
State of Alaska Division of Community and Regional
Affairs supports the Minerals Commission by
facilitating their annual meetings and assisting with
the annual report.
The Minerals Commission annually reports its
recommendations to the Governor and the Legislature
during the first ten days of the legislative session.
Key recommendations made by the Commission and
implemented by the Legislature since the Commission's
last extension in 2013 include: - Provided support for
analysis of the state obtaining primacy of the Clean
Water Act Section 404 Program - Continued to support
reforms of state permitting processes to make them
timelier and more efficient - Continued support for
development of access and power infrastructure
projects - Continued to support the Division of
Geological & Geophysical Survey (DGGS) - Continued to
support the gathering and publishing geological and
geophysical data on Alaska's mineral potential -
Continued to assert and defend public access to roads,
trails, and navigable waterways - Continued funding of
mining education programs and outreach
Mining is a cornerstone of our society and economy,
supporting all aspects of our everyday life; Alaska is
uniquely positioned to play a leadership role in
meeting the national mineral supply demand. Forty-nine
of the fifty minerals identified in 2022 by the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) as critical to the US
economy and national security are found in Alaska. The
state boasts a supportive natural resource development
policy, and a proven mining industry. There now exists
a rare alignment of mineral wealth in Alaska, demand,
federal policy, state support, and an established
industry, which presents an opportunity for mining
industry and economic growth. The Alaska Minerals
Commission has worked with the State of Alaska and
Alaska State Legislature to successfully implement key
recommendations that support a strong and sustainable
Alaska minerals industry.
SENATOR BISHOP concluded the introduction by relaying that
Alaska's most recent prospecting efforts were recorded in 1898
with the Klondike and Nome strikes. He noted that the USGS
stated that Alaska was 50 years behind in mineral exploration.
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL commented on the brevity of the legislation.
3:36:30 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN queried whether the board extension required a
Legislative Budget and Audit review.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP read a letter from Kris Curtis, Legislative
Auditor from the Legislative Audit Division:
Only those entities listed in 08.03.010(c) and
44.66.010(a) are subject to a sunset process per
44.66.050.
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL turned to invited testimony.
3:38:00 PM
ENRIQUE FERNANDEZ, Chair, Alaska Minerals Commission, Anchorage,
Alaska, provided invited testimony in support of SB 90. He
stated that he works as the permitting and environmental manager
for Donlin Gold, LLC. He informed the committee that the purpose
of the Alaska Minerals Commission is to provide recommendations
to the governor and legislature about policies and strategies
that promote the development of the state's mineral resources.
He stated that the commission members have extensive experience
in all aspects of the mining industry including exploration,
permitting and operations. He stated that the commission's
annual reports provide assessments of the state's mineral
resources and provide policy advice. He mentioned the state's
primacy of the Clean Water Act, Section 404, which is necessary
to bring stability to the permitting process.
MR. FERNANDEZ continued that the Alaska Minerals Commission is
advocating for the state to develop a comprehensive mineral
development plan that evaluates infrastructure, workforce,
dialog, and education needs. He remarked that the members of the
Alaska Minerals Commission are enthusiastic about the work at
hand and grateful for the opportunity to advise the governor and
legislature on topics they are passionate about. He requested an
extension of the commissions termination date.
3:40:15 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL held SB 90 in committee.
SB 49-CARBON STORAGE
3:40:30 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO.
49 "An Act relating to the geologic storage of carbon dioxide;
and providing for an effective date." She invited Kevin Connors
to testify on SB 49.
3:41:17 PM
KEVIN CONNORS, Assistant Director of Regulatory Compliance and
Energy Policy, Energy and Environmental Resource Center,
University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, provided
invited testimony on SB 49. He explained that he worked in
regulatory and program development for both class II and class
VI oil wells. He described the Energy and Environmental Resource
Center (EERC) as a non-teaching business unit within the
University of North Dakota. He stated that the EERC is industry
focused with a great reputation regionally and worldwide. He
added that EERC serves as the North Dakota energy research
center. He stated that the CO partnership is a research-focused
2
consortium with 20 years of applied experience. The consortium
includes the energy, agriculture, ethanol, coal, electricity,
oil, gas, service, and technology industries with 240 members.
He added that the centers unprecedented growth confirms the
interest in advancing technologies.
MR. CONNORS explained that the P-Corp partnership includes a
large regional consortium with ten states and four Canadian
provinces, including Alaska. He stated that the P-Corp
partnership began in 2019 and is currently in its fourth phase.
He noted that EERC partnered with the University of Alaska
Fairbanks Institute of Northern Engineering and the University
of Wyoming School of Energy Resources. He stated that the
mission of the P-Corp partnership focuses on the commercial
deployment of the technologies. He mentioned the contribution of
the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) to SB 49.
He remarked that IOGCC formed a task force in 2002 comprised of
experts, state regulators, the P-Corp partnership, the
Department of Energy and other key industry stakeholders. The
task force sought to ascertain whether the federal government is
the most appropriate regulator for dedicated geologic storage of
carbon dioxide. The task force recommended that the states
regulate the activity under a resource management framework,
similar to the regulation of oil and gas. He added that the
IOGCC developed a model statute and regulations. Portions of the
language included in SB 49 is rooted in the model statute
developed by the IOGCC task force.
3:46:54 PM
MR. CONNORS revealed that he works directly with commercial
project developers of Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) in North
Dakota and the surrounding region. He stated that he works on
greenfield, characterization, feasibility, project design, and
permitting. He added that operational projects receive
monitoring and reporting that follows with those activities. He
remarked on witnessing new industries emerging despite the
challenges. He expressed familiarity with the regulatory
frameworks similar to SB 49. He highlighted the priority of the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) to apply for
and obtain class VI primacy. He explained that when states
regulate predictability and permitting, they provide regulatory
certainty to the industry.
MR. CONNORS highlighted three key pieces of geologic storage:
industry, geology and policy. He stated his full support for SB
49, which initiates the application for class VI primacy. He
informed the committee that similar legislation was adopted in
other states. He stated that SB 49 provides a resource-
management framework that allows for an effective, all-
encompassing regulatory program. Only two states in the nation
have primacy: North Dakota and Wyoming. He noted that Louisiana
applied and is awaiting approval. He declared that the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authority can take several
years. He added that EPA is the permitting and regulatory
authority and approximately 40 permits were submitted to EPA.
MR. CONNORS mentioned that EPA approved multiple permits in
Illinois over a four to five year period. In contrast, North
Dakota, with primacy, issued four permits within the last year.
The permitting process was shortened to eight months. He stated
that primacy allowed the industry emerging in North Dakota a
predictable and known permitting process. He alleged that states
have an advantage by regulating the activity. The regulation
process enables the deployment of technology and allows for
economic opportunities and solutions for Alaska's energy
industry.
3:51:28 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL asked if there were questions.
3:51:41 PM
SENATOR KAWASAKI asked about class II wells, which are common in
Alaska. He queried how frequently class II wells transition to
class VI wells.
MR. CONNORS answered that EPA established class VI rules in
2010. He revealed that a federal code identifies the transition
of oil well classes. He stated that the transition is tied to
pressure and project intent. He spoke about potential challenges
associated with the transition to a mineral-bearing zone, which
requires permission from the mineral owner to use their minerals
as a storage horizon. He remarked that he had not witnessed a
transition in the oil well class. The future may include the use
of depleted oil and gas reservoirs, but most states mandate
optimal recovery of oil and gas resources. Transitioning to a
class VI reservoir means that production ceases. He opined that
a path toward continued production and storage is associated
with enhanced oil recovery. He recognized the storage aspects of
CO-enhanced oil recovery. He anticipated great benefits to
2
enhanced oil recovery compared to CO storage. He explained that
2
CO injection recovery involves managing a reservoir and
2
pressures within the reservoir; the activity is considered
storage.
3:54:25 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked how long North Dakota waited to receive
the class VI certification.
MR. CONNORS answered that he led the effort, and it took about
five years.
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL asked if the carbon storage is collected from
currently functioning power plants. She wondered if North Dakota
employed technology to capture carbon from the air.
MR. CONNORS responded that a combination of supplies are
utilized including lignite coal. He furthered that electricity
generation from ethanol plants and corn belt capture are also
utilized. He explained that the states in the corn belt lack the
appropriate geology for large-scale geologic storage, so
captured CO requires transport. He mentioned that CO capture in
22
Wyoming's natural gas processing facilities utilizes a pipeline
to transport CO to Montana and North Dakota. He added that North
2
Dakota has been capturing CO since 2000 in a lignite coal
2
gasification plant utilizing a pipeline to transport CO to oil
2
fields in southern Saskatchewan.
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL asked about the federal credits North Dakota
obtains.
MR. CONNORS replied that the Section 45Q tax credit is available
to the project developer, which incentivizes advancing projects.
He revealed that the Section 45Q tax credit is $85/ton for
saline storage, and $60/ton for CO as it is stored in
2
association with enhanced oil recovery. He added that higher
incentives exist for direct air capture. The Section 45Q tax
credits incentivize commercial development and deployment and
are made available to the capturer or the storage provider
depending on the business arrangement.
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL assumed that North Dakota gleaned revenue from
the core space.
MR. CONNORS replied that the North Dakota core space is
privately owned. He expounded that surface owners own the core
space, which is leased, and private landowners are compensated.
He furthered that North Dakota saw economic benefits as the
state exports more than it consumes. North Dakota provides
energy to multiple states via the coal fleet and oil and gas
industries. He cited North Dakota's goal to reach carbon
neutrality. He shared that North Dakota's agriculture and energy
industries provide the pillars of the state's economy and
carbon-intensive industries. He revealed that North Dakota
considered carbon capture utilization and storage as a solution
to reducing the carbon intensity of the industries. North Dakota
reaps the benefits of economic interest and advancement because
of the practices. He stated that North Dakota receives
investment interest because of the early work with CCS projects.
4:01:23 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked what the average landowner receives
per acre and ton. He wondered if North Dakota captures revenue
via taxes.
MR. CONNORS replied that there is a fee associated with CO
2
storage used to pay for the administration of the regulatory
program and the long-term transition of a closed site. He
explained that CCS did not yield a direct economic benefit to
North Dakota, however, the agriculture and energy industries
benefit economically and pay into state revenues. He revealed
that state revenue is gained from taxing the oil, gas, coal, and
agriculture industries. The revenue is allocated to school
systems and other programs.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI requested the per acre and ton value. He
asked if the state taxed the industry directly for carbon
storage.
MR. CONNORS denied a specific tax other than the fee associated
with CO storage. The benefit is that carbon storage attracts new
2
industries. The state does not receive direct revenue but
creates great opportunities for industries to thrive.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked how a state might receive revenue
from CCS. He asked if the industry is taxed when they inject
carbon into the wells.
MR. CONNORS restated that CO storage is not taxed other than the
2
fees associated. He shared that the North Dakota Legislature
considered a higher fee for out-of-state CO. The state benefits
2
from attracting new industries because of interest in carbon
capture and the hydrogen economy. He stated that sales tax
incentives exist for industries seeking to capture CO. He added
2
that pipelines for CO enhanced recovery operations allow for
2
further tax incentives. North Dakota allows industries to thrive
with a business-friendly environment and safeguards ensuring
that CO storage and transport are done safely.
2
4:06:14 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP queried Mr. Connors experience with coal power
plants and feasibility studies related to carbon direct-air
capture.
MR. CONNORS replied that he had experience with both. He added
that project developers were encouraged to characterize
geological prospects. The projects were supported from
characterization through feasibility and permitting. He
mentioned a coal-fired power plant that is permitted to store
four million metric tons of CO underneath the facility. He added
2
that the project received federal funding. He mentioned helping
an electric company characterize its geology for a geologic
storage project that was approved in January of 2023.
CO-CHAIR BISHOP requested a further conversation with Mr.
Connors.
MR. CONNORS agreed to have another conversation.
4:07:59 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL held SB 49 in committee.
^DISCUSSION: CERAWEEK 2023
DISCUSSION: 2023 CERAWEEK
4:08:25 PM late
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL announced that the committee would hear from
Commissioner-Designee Boyle and Commissioner-Designee Crum about
their recent trip to the Cambridge Energy Research Associates
2023 CERAWeek.
4:08:43 PM
JOHN BOYLE, Commissioner-Designee, Department of Natural
Resources, Anchorage, Alaska, introduced himself.
4:08:53 PM
ADAM CRUM, Commissioner-Designee, Department of Revenue,
Anchorage, Alaska, introduced himself.
4:09:21 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE informed the committee that the 2023
CERAWeek event reinforced his values about Alaska showing up.
He stated that CERAWeek is a conference that unites the chief
executive officers (CEOs) of energy companies, infrastructure
investors, private equity players, philanthropic organizations
and government policymakers. He learned during CERAWeek about
how other areas market themselves, Canada and Alberta in
particular. He credited Ellie Rubenstein, a board member of the
Alaska Permanent Fund, for helping establish a robust meeting
schedule that provided opportunities for important connections
and conversations.
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE relayed the omission of Alaskas
resource opportunities in CERAWeek attendees minds and plans.
He opined that Alaska's resources may help expand industry
investment portfolios and move forward with the process of
energy transformation.
4:12:32 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE CRUM agreed with the perception that
Alaska was forgotten during the CERAWeek event. He spoke about
conversations with renewable energy and infrastructure funding
professionals that revolved around Alaska's Permanent Fund and
cruise industry. He reported his focus on educating
professionals about Alaska's resource complexity. He mentioned a
philanthropic group that invested in grid upgrades and
electrification of off-road systems in Africa, which provided an
opportunity to educate people about Alaska's off-road systems.
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE CRUM explained the goal of further
education about renewable energy. He shared that groups
approached him at the end of CERAWeek with conversations about
renewable energy projects. He opined that the conversations
provide an opportunity for Alaska to continue the unified pitch.
He shared an idea spurred by the salmon lunch that was provided
at the CERAWeek conference; he wondered if an Alaskan salmon
lunch might help market the states resources.
4:15:47 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE spoke about the CERAWeek attendees
interest in major infrastructure project development. He shared
conversations with investors interested in AKL&G. He reported
the lack of large projects available for those interested in
investing in larger projects. He highlighted Alaska's value as a
major energy source from an Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) country protected from
geopolitical shipping risks. He added that the carbon bills
currently dissected in Alaska coupled with tax credits may yield
tangible project interest.
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE stated that the CERAWeek
conversations highlighted net zero carbon emissions. He
acknowledged that transforming energy systems can destabilize
countries, economies and geopolitical power. He stressed the
importance of a measured approach to transforming systems. He
spoke about his opportunity to highlight Alaska's projects and
the low Greenhouse Gas (GHG) ranking. He noted the interest in
investing in environmentally responsible areas with
environmental justice principles.
4:22:11 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked about carbon capture and the AKL&G
projects. He mentioned past Senate Resources Committee
conversations related to carbon capture and other countries
carbon storage needs. He asked if Alaska's opportunity was via
the AKL&G project or imported carbon.
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE replied that the opportunity exists
everywhere. He opined that each project had tremendous benefits.
He stated that AKL&G created a large demand because of the gas
treatment plant on the North Slope. He stated that North Slope
gas had a 12.5 percent CO content. He explained the goal of
2
removing the CO from the natural gas stream to allow for an
2
economic value. He stated that the CCS could supplement enhanced
oil recovery in Prudhoe Bay or permanently sequester the carbon
in reservoirs on the North Slope, presenting a value-added
proposition for the state. He highlighted investor excitement
about a gas line to Nikiski and the production of Liquified
Natural Gas (LNG), hydrogen, and ammonia. He mentioned an
opportunity where ammonia could be shipped to Asian nations with
vessels returning full of CO for sequestration. He stressed the
2
opportunity for a value chain based on Alaska's strategic
geographic location.
4:25:59 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE CRUM agreed with the value chain
commentary and added the importance of in-process carbon
capture. He remarked on the ammonia, hydrogen and eFuel
processes. He explained that eFuel processes utilize CO to
2
electrolyze hydrogen and create a methanol-based product for use
in combustion engines. He informed the committee about lithium
batteries and the long and intensive production process
involved. He highlighted the notion of a value chain that
monetizes the carbon produced. He spoke about Fairbanks and the
potential for a consistent and clean gas supply. He mentioned
learning about old refineries that are transforming production.
4:28:10 PM
CO-CHAIR BISHOP asked Commissioner-Designee Boyle's for his
plans to promote Alaska during next years CERAWeek. He also
asked if Cook Inlet would serve as the next Qatar or Mecca for
carbon capture in Alaska. He spoke about Alaska's challenges
with intermittent power.
4:28:53 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE CRUM replied to Co-chair Bishops first
question and stated his excitement about promoting Alaska during
next years CERAWeek. He spoke about a study in the Journal of
Science addressing carbon monoxide wavelengths on satellite
images following CO release from forest fires. He spoke about
2
the interest in active forest management for carbon credits.
4:30:42 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE responded to Co-chair Bishops first
question. He remarked on the practice of geologic
characterization by the Division of Geological and Geophysical
Surveys. He spoke about the team of experts employed at the
division that delineate Alaska's mineral potential. He opined
that the state would benefit from an increased capacity in the
geothermal realm. He sought funding to establish geologic
characterizations leading to a high potential for geothermal
development. He stated that the characterizations would allow
him to present findings to potential investors at future
CERAWeek events. He stressed that characterizations allow the
government to drive Alaska's economy.
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE continued with Co-chair Bishops
second question. He opined that Alaska has a strategic advantage
with Cook Inlet. He noted the AKL&G facilities with the geology
under or adjacent to Cook Inlet provide incredible sequestering
opportunities and carbon hubs for Asian countries interested in
growing their economies.
4:35:21 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE CRUM shared that Alaska's oil and gas
production utilizes minimal holes, which increases the carbon
structure opportunities because of the lack of leaking or
capping effects.
4:36:04 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR stated that the Alaska Industrial Development and
Export Authority (AIDEA) holds leases in the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). He wondered if AIDEA participated in
CERAWeek. He asked if the commissioner-designee recalled
positive or negative references to ANWR.
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE CRUM replied that he serves as an AIDEA
board member. He revealed that the Willow project monopolized
the discussions and ANWR was not mentioned. He added that the
National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPRA) was at the forefront of
the CERAWeek discussions.
SENATOR KAUFMAN queried plans for an Alaskan marketing plan. He
suggested a legislative checklist to enable an actionable
economic plan. He opined that the state relies heavily on the
Washington delegation.
4:38:01 PM
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE CRUM replied that the governor allocated
$5 million for Alaska's marketing efforts. He spoke about recent
deliberations related to marketing since returning from
CERAWeek. He mentioned meetings with credit rating agencies in
the Department of Revenue. He stated that collaborative
discussions bring awareness to those entities interested in the
states ability to lend and those interested in investing in
Alaska. He suggested a marketing approach highlighting the
credit rating because it may encourage interest in investment
opportunities.
COMMISSIONER-DESIGNEE BOYLE added that an economic sub-cabinet
group meets regularly with commissioners. He expressed that the
marketing opportunity exists, as seen recently at CERAWeek and
the next step involves an action plan. He expressed his belief
that the legislature has a critical role in establishing
marketing priorities. He stressed the importance of big-picture
policy requirements. He spoke about the overlap between
resources such as agriculture, carbon, forestry, oil, and gas.
He expressed optimism about marketing the state and sought
legislative opinions about how to move forward.
4:41:39 PM
CO-CHAIR GIESSEL recalled the meeting between joint leadership
and the governor. She relayed the governors query about the
collaborative promotion of Alaska. She stated that legislators
contributed ideas and she acknowledged the importance of the
mission. She shared her enthusiasm about educating the world via
an advertising campaign about the benefits and advantages of
investing in Alaska's natural resources. She appreciated the
update and the commissioner-designee's contributions.
4:43:19 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Co-Chair Giessel adjourned the Senate Resources Standing
Committee meeting at 4:43 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 90 Support Letter AMA 03.17.23.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Support Letter CAP 03.13.23.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Support Letter RDC 03.13.23.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Ver. A 03.22.23.PDF |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Fiscal Note DCCED 03.17.23.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Sponsor Statement Ver A 03.21.23.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Support Doc Alaska Minerals Commission Report January 2023.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Support Doc Economic Benefits of Alaska's Mining Industry 03.22.23.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 90 Support Doc Mining in Alaska Map 03.22.23.pdf |
SRES 3/22/2023 3:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |